Skip to content
Sustainable Gaps

How Sustainable Gaps works

Understand the work before designing the solution.

SG studies the people and conditions involved, identifies why the issue occurs, and implements a practical solution for the organization using it.

What happens before work begins

Each step is explained before the next one begins.

01

Initial consultation

A conversation at no cost to understand the situation and decide whether SG may be able to help. There is no obligation to continue.

02

Operational evaluation

If a deeper investigation is appropriate, the questions, access, deliverables, timing, and fee are agreed in writing before work begins.

03

Implementation

Any procedures, records, training, project controls, or system configuration are scoped after the problem and desired result are understood.

04

Handoff and support

The completed work stays with the client. Ongoing support is optional and defined separately when the team wants it.

The engagement path

Four actions keep the work grounded.

  1. 01

    Listen

    People closest to the work explain what they experience, what has already been tried, and what the business needs to improve.

  2. 02

    Observe

    SG follows examples through the people, decisions, information, systems, and conditions involved.

  3. 03

    Identify

    The visible symptom is separated from the root cause and the business effect is documented.

  4. 04

    Implement

    SG implements the agreed correction, supports adoption, and leaves the organization able to operate it.

Beginning, current, and desired state

Make the difference visible.

An evaluation compares the intended result, what is happening now, and what the organization needs instead. That difference defines the work to be solved.

Beginning state

What was the work originally expected to accomplish?

Current state

What is happening under real operating conditions?

Desired state

What practical result should the improved process produce?

What SG examines

A problem rarely belongs to one category.

The evaluation looks at the full working environment so an improvement in one area does not create a new problem somewhere else.

People

Responsibilities, decision authority, workload, training, and the practical knowledge required to complete the work.

Process

The actual sequence of actions, decisions, approvals, exceptions, and handoffs.

Information

The records, instructions, status, and context people need at the moment of action.

Technology

The systems already in use, how they support the work, and where configuration or integration may help.

Methods behind the work

Established methods, explained in useful terms.

SG draws from project management, systems thinking, Six Sigma, process improvement, and field experience. The method adds rigor without requiring the client to speak in acronyms.

3-State Gap Model

The 3-State Gap Model is a method, not a service family or a visitor-facing diagnosis.

Root cause analysis

A disciplined way to determine why a problem occurs instead of repeatedly treating the symptom.

Process mapping

A visual description of how work moves today and how the improved process works.

After-action review

A structured comparison of what was expected, what occurred, why it differed, and what should change next time.

Project governance

Clear responsibilities, decisions, reporting, and controls for complex or multi-team work.

Continuous improvement

Measured adjustments that help a process remain effective as conditions, workload, and responsibilities change.

Use systems the organization already owns.

When Microsoft 365, Teams, SharePoint, Planner, Loop, Whiteboard, Power BI, or Azure can support the solution, SG configures those tools around the work instead of adding another subscription by default.

Leave the client in control.

The completed work should include understandable procedures, useful records, training, and a clear handoff. Ongoing support can be arranged, but dependence is not the product.

Typical deliverables

  • Current-state findings and root-cause explanation
  • Recommended corrective actions and priorities
  • Process maps, procedures, and decision records
  • Microsoft 365 workflow or project-control configuration
  • Training, implementation support, and handoff
  • Measures for reviewing whether the correction is working

Continue

See the method applied to real operating conditions.

The case studies connect this approach to documented work, practical decisions, and results that remained useful after the engagement.